Historias de éxito
Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful H-1B Denial for Client That Was Previously Associated with Dream Chase Technology LLC (December 2025)
In November 2025, our office successfully reversed an immigrant visa denial and rendered the U.S. Consulate’s request for an I-601 Waiver moot for a client applying for an immigrant visa. Our client was the beneficiary of an approved family based immigrant petition based on a parent child relationship. Our client had previously joined the Communist Party as a mandatory condition of employment with a state owned enterprise. The client’s membership spanned more than twenty years during their employment. The client had no ideological beliefs, political convictions, or leadership involvement in the Party and remained only a passive member. After retirement, the client stopped paying membership dues and no longer attended any meetings or activities associated with the Party. Unfortunately, the client did not obtain formal documentation certifying termination of Party membership. The client attended an immigrant visa interview at the U.S. Consulate. Following the interview, the Consulate requested detailed written responses regarding the client’s past Communist Party membership. At that time, the client was not represented by an attorney. After submitting responses to the consular officer, the client was issued a visa denial pursuant to INA section 212(a)(3)(D). The U.S. Consulate further requested that the client apply for an I-601 Waiver of Inadmissibility with USCIS. Under U.S. immigration law, prior membership in a totalitarian party such as the Communist Party may result in a finding of inadmissibility, often leading to visa refusal and the requirement to file an I-601 Waiver. These waiver applications frequently involve lengthy processing times and prolonged family separation. Based on our experience, I-601 waivers for former Communist Party members can take at least one year to process, and USCIS publicly indicates that processing may take more than three years. Due to the anticipated delay, the client contacted our office for legal assistance. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team conducted a thorough review of the case history. Through strategic legal advocacy, carefully crafted legal arguments, and comprehensive supporting evidence, we demonstrated that the client qualified for statutory exceptions under the Immigration and Nationality Act. As a result of our advocacy, including direct communication with the U.S. Consulate and multiple follow ups, the Consulate withdrew the visa denial, determined that an I-601 Waiver was no longer required, and cleared the client for immigrant visa issuance. We are pleased to have successfully assisted our client in overcoming this complex legal issue and enabling family reunification in the United States without unnecessary delay. Related Success Stories: Success Story: Federal Lawsuit Forced USCIS to Concede and Reverse Course on An Improper Denied I-130 and I-485 Petitions (March 2024) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an I-485 and I-601 Waiver Application for past CCP member (February 2024) Successfully Reversed Previous Denial of I-485 Green Card Application for past member of Communist Party (January 2024) Success Story: I-485 Application Approved within 14 days after Responding to RFE for Client That Was a Past Member of Chinese Communist Party (July 2023) Success Story: I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved within 3 days (May 2022) Success Story: I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved within 3 weeks (November 2021) Could an I-601 Waiver be Granted on the Basis of "Public Interest" Alone? Yes, it could. (April 2021) Obtained Green Card for Past Member of Communist Party Without Filing an I-601 Waiver Application (March 2021) Success Story: Federal Lawsuit Forced USCIS to Concede and Reverse Course on An Improper Denied I-130 Petition (February 2021) Success Story: I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved (Oct 2020) Obtained Immigrant Visa for Past Member of Vietnam Communist Party Without Filing I-601 Waiver (July 2020) I-601 Waiver of China Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Approved within 7 weeks (March 2020) USCIS Request for an I-601 Waiver of Communist Party Member Inadmissibility Withdrawn Without Filing I-290B form- Client Received Green Card
In September 2025, the USCIS Field Office in Santa Ana, California reversed its prior denial and approved our client’s Form N-400 application for naturalization in just ONE day. Our client has been scheduled for naturalization ceremony. Our client’s original denial was based on allegations that our client was barred from Naturalization due to past enrollment with the fraudulent schools Neo-America Language School (“Neo”) and Walter Jay MD Institute (“WJI.”) between 2012 and 2014. USCIS also alleged that our client gave false testimony during the Naturalization process, citing minor inconsistencies in their recollection of events that occurred more than a decade ago. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team assisted the client in filing their Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings. We submitted a detailed legal memorandum, supporting evidence, and prepared our client well before their N-336 hearing. We also raised the arguments that any discrepancies in our client’s testimony were due solely to the passage of time and did not rise to the level of false testimony under INA § 101(f)(6). Our client had no knowledge of the institutions’ fraudulent activities and reasonably relied on their SEVP certification, which indicated federal compliance at the time of their enrollment. At the hearing, the reviewing USCIS officer interviewed our client extensively, but our client was well prepared and was able to respond to the officer’s questions. We are pleased to learn that just ONE day after our client’s N-336 hearing, USCIS reversed its previous N-400 denial, and scheduled our client for a naturalization ceremony.
In January 2025, U.S. Department of State approved our client’s application for nonimmigrant waiver and request for expedited visa processing based on humanitarian concerns. Our client returned to the U.S. just a few weeks after their visa interview. Our client was found to be inadmissible due to an unfortunate experience with a company called Integra Technologies LLC. (“Integra”). During our client’s participation in the OPT program in 2017, our client accepted a remote, unpaid internship. In 2023, after living in the U.S. for nearly eight years, first as an F-1 student and then as an H-1B skilled worker, our client was informed that they must attend a visa interview at the U.S. Consulate in India in order to complete their application to transfer to a new employer. At the visa interview on mid-2023, our client was informed for the first time that their F-1 visa had been revoked in 2020 based on their previous employment with the company Integra. Importantly, the U.S. government did not uncover the fraudulent nature of the company until 2018; several years after our client had already left the company. The denial left our client stranded in India and barred them from rejoining their spouse, in the U.S. Our client also lost their job as a result of the Consulate’s visa denial. In order to be reunited with their spouse, our client applied for multiple visa appointments without success. When our client reached out to our office, attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team submitted our client’s H-4 visa application, which included a request for a waiver of inadmissibility. Among many other arguments we advanced for our clients, we provided substantial evidence to show that our client poses no threat to the interests or security of the United States. Their conduct underlying the inadmissibility finding was an isolated incident that occurred several years ago and was neither serious nor intentional in nature. Our client’s primary purpose for returning to the United States is to reunite with their spouse and begin building a family, a goal that underscores their strong personal and humanitarian ties to the country. We are very pleased that U.S. State Department agrees with our positions and issued our client’s visa in just a few weeks after their interview so that they could reunite with their family. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, Dream Chase Technology LLC, Vetro Technologies, Inc., AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading, Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, Dash Technologies, Inc. or XCG Design Corp in any manner or capacity, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to immediately advise you, identify potential issues early, and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits.
In December 2024, USCIS Chicago field office approved our client’s Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility, just three weeks after our firm submitted the waiver application. Our client received their green card immediately after the I-601 approval. Our client had been deemed inadmissible based on alleged prior misrepresentations and/or fraud in connection with a previous association with the fraudulent employer Findream, LLC, as detailed in a USCIS Request for Evidence (RFE.) Specifically, USCIS alleged that the client submitted a fraudulent Form I-20 and a false employment letter in support of the STEM OPT application. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu conducted a thorough review of the client’s case file and the surrounding factual circumstances related to Findream, LLC. Upon careful analysis, our firm concluded that the client qualified for the waiver of inadmissibility for misrepresentation and fraud. We promptly prepared and submitted a detailed RFE response, including extensive supporting documentation, to establish the client’s eligibility for the waiver. Our submission clearly demonstrated that the denial of admission would cause extreme hardship to the client’s spouse, a U.S. lawful permanent resident. Accordingly, the client was eligible for the I-601 waiver. We further argued that USCIS should exercise favorable discretion in adjudicating the waiver due to numerous positive factors in the client’s case. Our team worked diligently to expedite the submission directly to USCIS. As a result of our strong advocacy, USCIS approved the I-601 waiver just three weeks after submission. We are pleased to have secured a favorable outcome for our client in record time. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, Dream Chase Technology LLC, Vetro Technologies, Inc., AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading, Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, Dash Technologies, Inc. or XCG Design Corp in any manner or capacity, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to immediately advise you, identify potential issues early, and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits.
In July 2023, our client’s N-400 naturalization application was approved after our office filed an N-336 Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings. Our client is now a U.S. citizen. Our client, originally from Ghana, immigrated to the United States through the Diversity Visa Program. After living in the U.S. for many years, they applied for naturalization. However, the USCIS field office in Fairfax, VA denied their application, claiming the client had not been lawfully admitted to the United States. USCIS based this decision on the client’s failure to disclose their children on the original diversity visa application years earlier. In essence, USCIS argued that the omission constituted a material misrepresentation, making the client ineligible for naturalization. Following this denial, the client contacted our office for assistance. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team accepted representation and promptly filed Form N-336, Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings (under Section 336 of the INA). This type of hearing, similar to a naturalization interview, gives applicants and their attorneys the opportunity to challenge legal or factual errors made by USCIS. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu worked closely with the client to develop persuasive legal arguments and compile supporting documentation. We argued that USCIS’s claim that our client intentionally misled the government was unfounded. The omission of the children’s names was the result of a genuine misunderstanding of the diversity visa application questions, not an attempt to obtain an unfair advantage. Importantly, the omission did not result in the client receiving any immigration benefit they were not otherwise entitled to. We further demonstrated that our client consistently acted in good faith, making every effort to comply with immigration requirements. We also highlighted that even the U.S. Department of State had acknowledged that the diversity visa instructions were unclear, often causing confusion. On that basis, we argued it was unjust to penalize the client for an unintentional misunderstanding. After thoroughly reviewing the appeal and the full record, a senior USCIS officer overturned the denial and approved the client’s application. We are pleased to have successfully secured a favorable outcome for our client. Related Success Stories on N-336 and USCIS Reversal of N-400 Denial: Naturalization Approved Despite Prior Federal Conviction for Structuring Transactions 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(3) Success Story: Naturalization Approved After N-336 Hearing! (January 2022) Another N-336 Success: Naturalization Approved After N-336 Hearing! (September 2022) Successfully Reversed Previous Denial of N-400 Naturalization Application through Post Conviction Relief (August 2022) S uccessfully Reversed Previous Denial of N-400 Naturalization Application (February 2022)
Can You Get U.S. Citizenship With a Federal Structuring Conviction? Yes — Here’s Proof
Overcoming a Federal Criminal Conviction to Achieve Naturalization Approval
Naturalization Success Story: Citizenship Granted After 31 U.S.C. § 5324 Conviction
Client Approved for U.S. Citizenship Despite Prior Federal Structuring
In May 2025, our office successfully assisted a client in removing an inadmissibility finding under Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (misrepresentation and fraud) through LegalNet. Our client is currently awaiting visa issuance by the U.S. Consulate in Hyderabad, India. As an F-1 international student, our client participated in the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program and was hired by AZTech. Unbeknownst to our client, AZTech appeared to be a possible shell company. AZTech used elaborate means to entice mostly Indian students to pay for training in exchange for temporary employment, seemingly to fulfill F-1 OPT requirements. It appears AZTech falsely promised training services, networking opportunities, and internships perceived to be legitimate employment opportunities. Many F-1 students relied on these promises and received job offers from AZTech. Following NBC Bay Area's investigation exposing the questionable nature of various OPT companies, USCIS and the Department of State have relentlessly pursued former students associated with companies like AZTech. USCIS has issued Requests for Evidence (RFEs), Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs), and conducted interviews by USCIS Fraud Detection Officers, all alleging misrepresentation and fraud. Many students and former students also experienced the revocation of their F-1 and H-1B visas. Some were fortunate enough to receive a non-immigrant visa INA 212(d)(3) waiver of inadmissibility, but these waivers require renewal every few years. Previously, our client was briefly associated with AZTech as an unpaid intern during their OPT. The internship was a disappointment, and our client left for another opportunity. Many years later, when our client returned to India to apply for an H-1B visa, their visa application was refused because the U.S. Consulate found them inadmissible due to misrepresentation and fraud under Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) stemming from their association with AZTech. Fortunately, the U.S. Consulate recommended an INA 212(d)(3) waiver, and our client was able to return to the U.S. In 2025, our client returned to India and applied for another H-1B visa. The U.S. Consulate again denied the visa application but recommended a waiver. This time, however, our client’s visa application was pending for over three months, and their employer became increasingly frustrated with the delayed return. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on the representation to assist our client. The evidence presented sufficiently supported a finding that the client did not make false representations to procure a benefit under U.S. immigration laws. The firm is very pleased to learn that just ONE day after we contacted LegalNet with a clear explanation and an attorney legal memo addressing our client's past association with AZTech, LegalNet responded. They informed us that, upon further review, our client’s ineligibility under Section 212(a)(6)(C)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) has been removed, and the Consulate will contact our client directly with further instructions on how to proceed. We are very pleased to learn that we were able to obtain a positive result for our client in record time. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading, Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, Reuters Technology Group, or XCG Design Corp in any manner or capacity, it is important to consult with an experienced attorney to immediately advise you, identify potential problems early in your case, and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Latest Success Stories: Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful H-1B Denial for Client That Was Previously Associated with Dream Chase LLC (December 2025) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced U.S. State Department to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-4 Visa Application for A Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (April 2024) Finding Your Way Out of FINDREAM and SINOCONTECH FRAUD Allegations Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (December 2022) Successfully Overcome H-1B RFE for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (April 2023) Successfully Overcome H-1B Extension NOID for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (June 2023) Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022)
In February 2025, our office successfully assisted a client in obtaining their H-1B visa from the U.S. Consulate in Hyderabad, India. Our client was forced to leave the U.S. and apply for an H-1B visa due to the denial of their H-1B extension. In the denial, USCIS claimed that our client made false statements and failed to maintain their status while on OPT with Apex IT Systems Inc. ("Apex IT"). As an F-1 visa international student, our client participated in the OPT program and was hired by Apex IT. Unbeknownst to our client, a USCIS investigation later revealed that Apex IT was a fraudulent organization. In response, USCIS has relentlessly pursued former students associated with Apex IT, issuing Requests for Evidence ("RFE") and Notices of Intent to Deny ("NOID") alleging misrepresentation and fraud. Notably, in some RFEs and NOIDs, USCIS asserted that former students should have known that Apex IT's address was a Mexican restaurant in a strip mall. USCIS faulted the students for failing to recognize this and denied many of their STEM OPT or H-1B applications. While our client was still in the U.S., their employer timely filed for their H-1B extension. USCIS then issued a NOID alleging that our client had committed misrepresentation and fraud and had failed to maintain status during their F-1 OPT period. Our client’s employer’s immigration counsel assisted them in responding to the NOID. However, USCIS denied the extension application, forcing our client to return to India to apply for an H-1B visa stamp. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on representation to assist the client with the visa application process. We conducted multiple mock interviews to ensure the client was well-prepared. Our office also prepared a legal brief, the client’s statement, and supporting documents to firmly establish that our client had not made any misrepresentations to the U.S. government regarding their past OPT employment. Furthermore, the record clearly demonstrated that our client had maintained valid status during their F-1 OPT period and, therefore, should not be found inadmissible. We are pleased to report that one week after our client’s consular interview, their H-1B visa was approved, and they are now on their way back to the U.S. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, XCG Design Corp, or Apex IT Systems Inc. in any capacity, it is crucial to consult with an experienced immigration attorney immediately. Early consultation can help identify potential issues in your case and develop a strong strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Related Success Stories on Apex IT: Successfully Obtained STEM OPT For Student That Was Previously Associated With Apex IT Systems Inc.(Oct 2024) Successfully Assisted a Client Who Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies Inc. to Obtain H-1B Visa from US Consulate in India ( November 2023) Successfully Assisted a Client Who Was Previously Associated with Andwill to Obtain H-1B Visa from US Consulate in India Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022) Successfully Overcome H-1B RFE for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (April 2023) Successfully Overcome H-1B Extension NOID for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (June 2023) Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after THREE previous H-1B denials (August 2023) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (Dec 2022)
In June 2024, our office represented a client in overcoming allegations of misrepresentation and fraud related to their association with Smoothies Technology Inc. As an F-1 visa holder, a foreign student is permitted to study in the United States. F-1 visa holders are eligible to extend their stay through Optional Practical Training (OPT), a program that allows students to obtain temporary employment in their field of study. Unbeknownst to many F-1 international students, FINDREAM founder Weiyun “Kelly” Huang and the corporations she established were convicted of conspiracy to commit visa fraud in 2020. Huang used deceptive means to lure students into paying for her services in exchange for securing temporary employment to fulfill OPT requirements. FINDREAM falsely promised training services, networking opportunities, and internships that appeared to be legitimate employment opportunities. Many F-1 students fell victim to the fraud perpetrated by Huang and her accomplices. Following the convictions of the perpetrators, USCIS has relentlessly pursued student victims of this fraud as “knowing co-conspirators” if they were previously employed by FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading Inc., Andwil LLC, Wireclass, New Beast, Smoothies Technology Inc., and ApexIT Technologies Inc. After our client’s F-1 OPT period ended, they returned to their home country for nearly a decade. In 2024, when they applied for an immigrant visa, they initially underwent a routine immigrant visa interview at the U.S. Consulate. However, they later received an email from the Fraud Prevention Unit requesting a secondary interview. During the secondary interview, the client was subjected to multiple interrogations and ultimately faced the denial of their immigration petition. The Fraud Prevention Unit officer accused our client of being a co-conspirator with Smoothies Technology Inc. and expressed disbelief in their testimony. Attorney Nguyen D. Luu and our legal team took on the case to assist the client in overcoming the misrepresentation allegations. We strategically guided them in rebutting the willful misrepresentation and fraud allegations made by USCIS. The evidence we presented sufficiently demonstrated that the client had not made false representations to obtain a benefit under U.S. immigration laws. Even if any false statement had been made, it was neither willful nor material, thereby overcoming all allegations. A finding of misrepresentation or fraud has severe immigration consequences. It can render a non-citizen inadmissible for life, potentially imposing a permanent bar to obtaining permanent residency unless USCIS grants a waiver at its discretion. Our firm is pleased to share that after the secondary interview, our client was scheduled for a third interview, during which their immigrant visa was approved and issued. If you were previously associated with FINDREAM, SINOCONTECH, Integra Technologies, AZTech Technologies, Tellon Trading Inc., Arecy, CG Max Design Corporation, XCG Design Corp, Andwil LLC, Wireclass, Codersdata LLC, New Beast, Smoothies Technology Inc., or GlobalITExperts in any manner or capacity, it is crucial to consult with an experienced immigration attorney. Professional legal guidance can help identify potential issues early and develop a strong case strategy before applying for any immigration benefits. Our office has became aware that in many instances, F-1, H-1B visa holders or even green card holders, most from India and China, are being refused admission at the U.S. port of entry, issued Notice of Intent to Deny or Request for Evidence, interviewed by USCIS Fraud Detection Officers, subjected to expedited removal orders, and finding of inadmissibility for misrepresentation and fraud, if they previously held work authorization by association with above companies. Latest Success Stories on Findream: Successfully Obtained I-485 Approval for Client That Failed to Recall Past Employment with Findream During I-485 Interview ( October 2023) Successfully Obtained H1B Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM Successfully Overcame NOID, Re-obtained H4 Status, and Green Card for Client That Was Previously Associated with SINOCONTECH Successfully Overcame RFE and Obtained H1B Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM ( Sept 2021) Successfully Obtained H-1B Visa and Green Card for Client That Was Previously Associated with DEALFAR ( Jan 2022) Success Story: Overcame NOID and Obtained H4 Status Extension for Client That Was Previously Associated with FINDREAM (January 2022) Successfully Obtained O-1 Visa for Client That Was Previously Associated with ARECY LLC (MAY 2022) Successfully Responded to RFE and Obtained H-1B Extension for Client That Was Previously Associated with Masswell and CG Max Design ( September 2022) Successfully Obtained THREE I-485 Approvals for Clients That Were Previously Associated with FINDREAM Successfully Obtained H4 Status for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC after TWO previous denials (November 2022) Federal Lawsuit Successfully Forced USCIS to Reverse a Wrongful Denial of an H-1B petition for Client That Was Previously Associated with Integra Technologies LLC (December 2022) Successfully Obtained I-485 Approval for Client That Was Previously Associated with CloudParticle (March 2023)